Community Risk Desk
Want me to run 2 more like this for your group?
Send 3 tokens your group is watching. We'll return score, top risks, and branded report links you can drop in chat.
Built for crypto communities, admins, and paid alpha groups
Caramelo (Caramelo)
Decision
2 agents
Chain: Solana🐝 Help others stay safe
$Caramelo looks risky. Share the warning or save the card before someone in your group apes in blind.
Want this for your whole group?
Send 3 tokens your community is already discussing. We'll return branded risk reports you can drop in chat.
Start a community pilotGet alerts if this token's risk changes:
Community Risk Desk
Want this as a standing risk desk for your group?
Send 3 tokens your community is already discussing. We'll return branded risk reports you can drop in chat.
Current Free scans include the full desk.
This report appears to come from an older cached scan. Run a fresh scan for the 6-agent Community Risk Desk. Pro adds:
Security Checks
Top Holders
Top 10: 50.6%On-Chain Security
Free includes the 6-agent Community Risk Desk. Upgrade to Pro for Upgraded models with dynamic expertise weighting.
- ✓ Upgraded models with dynamic expertise weighting
- ✓ Bidirectional Devil's Advocate — stress-tests bull AND bear cases
- ✓ 30-day scan history
AI on-chain (GPT-4o Mini); Caramelo is a nascent token with a high transaction count relative to its age, indicating initial interest. However, the significant concentration among top holders and the thin liquidity raise concerns about structural fragility and potential volatility in trading activity. Positives: High transaction count of 5,685 in the last 24 hours, suggesting active trading; Market cap of $23,043 indicates a low entry point for potential investors; Mint and freeze authorities have been revoked, reducing risks associated with centralized control Concerns: Top 10 holders control 50.6% of the total supply, indicating high concentration risk; Largest holder controls 25.6% of the total supply, which could lead to price manipulation; Liquidity is thin at $11,785.57, which may hinder trading execution and increase slippage; confidence 0.50
AI security (Claude Sonnet 4.5); Caramelo is a 1-day-old Solana meme token with revoked mint and freeze authorities (positive), but faces significant nascent-stage risks. The token exhibits mutable metadata (name/image can be changed), unknown LP lock status, and high holder concentration (top holder: 25.6%, top 10: 50.57%). Market cap is $23K with $11.8K liquidity, creating material rug risk if top holders exit. Volume-to-liquidity ratio of 18.5x suggests speculative churn. While missing RugCheck data and social presence are expected for a 1-day token, the combination of mutable metadata, concentrated holdings, shallow liquidity, and PumpAMM deployment (often associated with quick-launch tokens) creates a high-risk profile typical of pump-and-dump candidates. No critical honeypot mechanics detected, but holders face immediate economic exposure.; risks: Mutable metadata allows project to change token name, symbol, or image post-launch, enabling potential bait-and-switch tactics, Extreme holder concentration: single wallet controls 25.6% of supply, top 10 hold 50.57% — coordinated dump could collapse price instantly, Shallow liquidity ($11.8K) relative to market cap ($23K) and volume ($218K) creates high slippage risk and exit difficulty for holders, Unknown LP lock status with PumpAMM custody — no verification that liquidity is locked or burned, enabling potential rug pull; confidence 0.75
Why 37/100?
This cached result used an older limited agent set. Current Free scans run the 6-agent Community Risk Desk; rescan for the current surface.
How the Swarm Reached Consensus
The swarm overwhelmingly agreed Caramelo is an extremely high-risk asset, primarily due to severe ownership concentration (50.57% in top 10, 25.6% in one address) and dangerously shallow liquidity, where a $10k sell order incurs a 66% price impact. While TechnicianBot noted a high transaction count and low entry point, DevilsAdvocate and MacroBot emphasized the unverified contract, mutable metadata, and extreme fragility in a risk-off market. The F grade signifies a fundamentally unsound token with immediate rug pull or manipulation risks. Exercise extreme caution; this token presents significant downside potential.
Agent Debates
1 debate triggered️ TechnicianBot's 'high transaction count' is likely speculative churn or wash trading given the 18.5x volume-to-liquidity ratio and MacroBot's '9.5x volume/MCAP anomaly.' A 'low entry point' is irrelevant when 50.6% of supply is concentrated among a few wallets, creating extreme rug pull risk, not opportunity, despite revoked mint/freeze authorities.
While the Devil's Advocate correctly highlights that the high transaction count likely reflects speculative churn given the volume-to-liquidity ratio, my original score of 5.0 already accounts for the significant concentration among top holders and thin liquidity, which are direct indicators of potential manipulation and rug pull risk. The revoked mint/freeze authorities remain a positive, mitigating some centralized control risks, hence the balanced score reflecting both extreme risks and a few structural positives.
️ Technician's claim that a 5.0 score accounts for concentration and thin liquidity is insufficient; a 50.6% top-holder concentration and 18.5x volume-to-liquidity ratio indicate extreme, unmitigated rug pull risk, regardless of revoked authorities. These severe structural vulnerabilities mean any 'positive' from revoked mint/freeze is overshadowed by the inherent manipulative potential for early holders to dump on new entrants.
While the extreme concentration (50.6%) and high volume-to-liquidity ratio (18.5x) are significant red flags, the *revoked authorities* fundamentally alter the risk profile, mitigating the immediate threat of developer-initiated rug pulls. My 5.0 score accounts for this reduced developer control, acknowledging the remaining market manipulation risks but not equating them to an unmitigated rug pull threat from the team.
Evidence Locker
Market cap is $23K with $11.8K liquidity, creating material rug risk if top holders exit.
While missing RugCheck data and social presence are expected for a 1-day token, the combination of mutable metadata, concentrated holdings, shallow liquidity, and PumpAMM deployment (often associated with quick-launch tokens) creates a high-risk profile typical of pump-and-dump candidates.
No critical honeypot mechanics detected, but holders face immediate economic exposure.; risks: Mutable metadata allows project to change token name, symbol, or image post-launch, enabling potential bait-and-switch tactics, Extreme holder concentration: single wallet controls 25.6% of supply, top 10 hold 50.57% — coordinated dump could collapse price instantly, Shallow liquidity ($11.8K) relative to market cap ($23K) and volume ($218K) creates high slippage risk and exit difficulty for holders, Unknown LP lock status with PumpAMM custody — no verification that liquidity is locked or burned, enabling potential rug pull; confidence 0.75.
However, the significant concentration among top holders and the thin liquidity raise concerns about structural fragility and potential volatility in trading activity.
Concerns: Top 10 holders control 50.6% of the total supply, indicating high concentration risk; Largest holder controls 25.6% of the total supply, which could lead to price manipulation; Liquidity is thin at $11,785.57, which may hinder trading execution and increase slippage; confidence 0.50.
Unlock 6 agents · Full reasoning · Cancel anytime
Verify It Yourself
Current Free scans run the 6-agent Community Risk Desk.